During the past 6 months two sessions with senior government officials
have been organized. These involved 1.) The Canadian Society of Zoologists
(CSZ) and 2.) The Canadian Council of University Biology Chairs (CCUBC).
The following is a summary of the visits with Mr. Robert Best, Vice
President (National Affairs) Association of Universities & Colleges
of Canada (AUCC). Ms. Kim Houston A/Director Ecosystem Science, Fisheries
& Oceans Canada, Dr. Eliot Phillipson, President, Canadian Foundation
for Innovation (CFI), Mr. Jac van Beek, Vice President Programs, CFI,
Dr. Clément Gauthier, Executive Director, Canadian Council
on Animal Care (CCAC), Dr. Nigel Lloyd, Executive Vice-President,
Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
and other NSERC participants, Mr. Kevin Fitzgibbons, Executive Director,
Office of the National Science Advisor, Mr. Donald Boucher, Policy
Advisor, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Since the Government publication “Mobilizing Science and Technology”
the mood across all departments and agencies visited seemed positive
regarding the Conservatives’ new science strategy. The consistent
message that emerged from each group with which CSZ met was that the
most important approach is to clearly communicate to government (and
particularly to elected officials) the value that Canada gets for
its investment in science. Another suggestion was that the message
would have greater resonance if it were to come from someone other
than scientists (since scientists are often viewed as having a vested
interest in increased funding for science). Letters to MPs from parents
of undergraduate students or others that have been touched by science
through direct benefits from research programs would be most powerful.
CSZ commented that “ the Knowledge Translation program, being
negotiated with the Library of Parliament (LoP) and the Seminar Program
with the LoP seem like good ideas to move things along on this front.”
Following the CSZ visits the CCUBC held its annual meeting in Ottawa
and representatives met with Iain Stewart, Director General, Policy
Branch, Industry Canada (IC), Feyrouz Kurji, Director Higher Education
R & D Policy Directorate, IC, Dr. Suzanne Fortier President, Natural
Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and
other NSERC representatives, Dr. Eliot Phillipson, President, Canadian
Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and other CFI representatives, Mr.
Guy Lauzon, M.P., Conservative Party, Mr. Richard Botham, Director
Microeconomic Policy Analysis Division, Finance Canada (FC), and Ms.
Elisha Ram, Chief, Industry and Knowledge Economy Section , FC. In
these discussions the impression emerged that the Government was starting
to take more seriously the need for investing in research and highly
qualified personnel. In our visit to Industry Canada it was pointed
out that of the 5000 Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) 1000 CGS were
established over the past year. In addition there are now 4,800 scholarships
awarded by the 3 Federal Granting Agencies. and another 2000 CGS have
been announced. We were made aware that Training Grant competitions
are being pushed by Industry Canada in Public Administration Internships.
In our conversation Industry Canada indicated their effort to focus
on excellence and to push for excellence in key areas. The success
rates in grant competitions at CIHR and NSERC were considered. Success
rates at CIHR have traditionally been low and higher at NSERC. Currently,
NSERC is undergoing a review to determine its current policy regarding
success rates.
A continuing challenge for the Government is to encourage industry
to invest more heavily in research. At the same time Industry Canada
has through its initiatives provided $ 105 million from the 2007-8
Federal Budget to fund 7 new Centres of Excellence that have potential
to provide commercial spin-off.
The meeting with the Canadian Foundation for Innovation expressed
satisfaction with the Government’s 2007 budget. An allocation
of $510 million was announced. With the Government’s National
Strategy CFI consulted its community on the use of funds. CFI is satisfied
that its focus should continue to be an emphasis on awards based on
excellence and institutional priorities. CFI plans 4 new initiatives
through its Operations Fund, Leading Edge Fund; National Platforms
and Research Hospitals Fund. CFI will also recognize international
programs in all its programs. Mention was also made of CFI’s
Knowledge Translation Program to encourage partnerships with the private
sector also by support of research clusters.
The CCUBC Meeting with Dr. Susanne Fortier and Isabelle Blais was
positive and NSERC appears pleased with Government support. NSERC
will receive over $1 billion this year.
A competition involving $165 million will be available for distribution
among the 3 Federal Granting Agencies. An opportunity is available
for NSERC to receive ~$60 million for targeted areas. Money would
be available for operating facilities. NSERC is looking for proposals.
On an ongoing basis another $30 million/year will be available in
the following three years. The targeted groups would be like NCEs
with support for research, facilities and translation of knowledge
into products. NSERC is working with CIHR and SSHRC to devise programs
to improve students’ skills in entrepreneurship.
A
note of concern was voiced with regard to the number of students in
science and engineering in Canada’s Graduate School Programs.
Canada currently stands at 20th place among the OECD nations. NSERC
is looking at training grants in some areas. In order to attract students,
given the global competition for highly qualified personnel, stipends
will have to be competitive. The CGS have been a great help but current
NSERC stipends at $21, 000 are not competitive.
Increased support for The Discovery Grants Program is currently under
review. The “high success rate policy” is being examined
to determine whether it should be retained before a change in financial
allocation is initiated. NSERC is considering how support for “big
science” should be handled and is conferring with the Canadian
Academies of Science.
A meeting with Guy Lauzon, MP was informative. In discussions we
made reference to the Knowledge Translation Program that we have been
discussing with the LOP in an attempt to be a service to Parliamentarians.
He indicated that good point of contact would be the various House
and/or Senate Committees. The agenda of each of these committees would
be useful in identifying topics that are related to areas of science
on which CFBS could provide useful information.
In all 11 visits occurred with decision-makers. The overall impression
of individuals contacted regarding the Government’s attitude
to science was positive. A major concern for the Government continues
to be the lack of research investment by private corporations. We
concur that to obtain increased productivity it is imperative that
this situation improve. We also noted the efforts to take advantage
of moving new research ideas to the market place. CFBS is sympathetic
to the Government’s aim. Our main caution is that a healthy
balance is maintained in the financial support of the basic and applied
areas. With regard for the need for highly qualified individuals a
helpful sign is the increase in the Government’s budget from
$700 million to $800 million in the share of CST funding devoted to
post secondary education to bring the total to $3.2 billion. In subsequent
years the rate of increase will be 3%/year. Given the
need for highly qualified people and the current financial condition
of Canada’s universities we remained concerned and hope that
the rate of increase can be accelerated.