|
 |

| Science Policy Reports / Briefs |
| |
Canadian Consortium
for Research
Consortium Canadien pour la Recherche
2675 promenade Queensview Drive, Ottawa, ON, K2B 8K2
Tel (613) 820-2270 - Fax (613) 820-7244 www.cpa.ca/ccr
Jump to: Recomendations
| Operating Cost of Post Secondary Education | Granting Agencies |Government Research | Conclusion
A Brief
to the
House of Commons
Standing Committee on Finance
by the
Canadian Consortium for Research
September 2005
Chair
Chemical Institute of Canada
Steering Committee Members
Canadian Association of Physicists
Canadian Association of University Teachers
Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Canadian Federation of Biological Societies
Canadian Psychological Association
Chemical Institute of Canada
PART ONE - INTRODUCTION
The Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) is a coalition of 15 national
organizations representing over 500,000 individuals on the front lines
of research and study in Canada. Our members are from the public and private
sectors and engage in basic and applied research, study and practice in
the natural sciences, social sciences and humanities. The working experience
of our members has informed the Consortium’s deliberations and shaped
our recommendations to the Committee.
Our advice is straightforward. To build a dynamic and productive economy
- one in which Canadians enjoy the best quality of life and the highest
possible standard of living - the federal government must significantly
increase its spending to support:
- the core operations of post-secondary institutions through a dedicated
transfer;
- the federal research granting agencies; and
- its own research infrastructure.
PART TWO - RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation One – Increase Funding for the
Core Operating Costs of Post-secondary Education Institutions through
the Creation of a Dedicated Federal/Provincial Transfer
Post-secondary education institutions are the cornerstones of a modern,
productive economy. They play a central role in the creation of new knowledge
and the preparation of our next generation of researchers. Yet, by any
measure government support, both federal and provincial, for the core
operations of the post-secondary sector is woefully inadequate. Estimates
based on Department of Finance Fiscal Reference Tables indicate a 40%
real per capita decline in federal cash support for post-secondary education
between 1992 and 2004. Provincial support over the same period declined
8.6%. The result is a university and college system starved for cash.
Ontario, for example, ranked 59th out of 60 North American jurisdictions
in 2004 in per capita spending on post-secondary education. That placed
it ahead of only Tennessee. In practical terms this funding shortfall
undermines quality and accessibility by driving tuition fees higher, increasing
teacher/student ratios, increasing dependence on part-time faculty and
forcing institutions to turn to special interest groups for money. Educational
opportunities for students at both the undergraduate and graduate levels
are suffering. The physical infrastructure – libraries, laboratories,
buildings and grounds - of universities and colleges is also under threat.
The most recent estimates (2001) of the Canadian Association of University
Business Officers (CAUBO) set deferred maintenance costs in the university
sector at $3.6 billion.
Correcting this funding shortfall will contribute significantly to improving
Canada’s economic productivity and improving the lives of future
generations. The federal and provincial governments must recognize their
mutual responsibility, set aside their differences and create a dedicated
federal/provincial transfer to fund the core operations of post-secondary
education. To be successful the transfer must:
- be governed by nationally established principles ensuring accessibility,
quality and academic integrity;
- contain binding enforcement mechanisms; and
- to avoid perennial federal provincial disputes over the transfer
amount, be set at a fixed percentage of GDP (a target of 0.5% GDP would
restore federal funding to that of the late 1970's).
The Consortium has been calling for the creation of a dedicated federal
transfer for post-secondary education since 2000 and it was pleased when
the Finance Committee endorsed the concept in its 2004 Report. Momentum
for this idea is growing, with provincial governments coming onside. Now
is the time for the Government of Canada to take the lead and push forward
with this critical step to placing our nation on the road to greater prosperity.
The Federal Government has made important investments in university research.
Support for the core funding of universities will address critical needs
and magnify the impact of the research investments.
Recommendation Two - Increase the Budgets of the
Federal Research Grantng Agencies
In addition to funding the core operating costs of post-secondary institutions,
the Government of Canada plays another critical role in supporting research
in Canada - through its research agencies, the Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council (NSERC) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Funding for these agencies declined dramatically through the 1990's but
has risen in recent years. The research community acknowledges and applauds
these increases. Nonetheless, the current level of funding still leaves
the agencies unable to meet the growing needs of a new generation of researchers
coming into Canadian universities. If Canada is to maintain or increase
its ranking as an international leader in research, greater investment is
necessary. The Government must:-
as a priority, strengthen social, human and cultural research in
Canada by increasing the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s
funding to $460 million by 2008-2009 (more than half of all faculty and
graduate students work and study in the social sciences and humanities,
yet SSHRC’s budget is less than half of that of the other agencies
- it is past time that this imbalance be corrected);
- increase the budget of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research
to $1 billion by 2008-2009; and
- increase the budget of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council to $1.2 billion by 2008-2009.
To ensure greater accountability, efficiency and strategic planning in
the expenditure of these funds, the Consortium recommends that the agencies
be permitted to carry over unexpended allocations from one fiscal year
to the next.
The Consortium recommends that the scientific rigour of research be the
determinative factor in resource allocation. The issue of how to facilitate
greater private sector involvement in research in Canada, while still
ensuring that scientific excellence is the primary criterion in research
funding, is of great concern to the Consortium.
Recommendation Three - Re-invest in Government Research
Infrastructure
Increased support for post-secondary institutions and the research granting
agencies is essential, but the government must also re-invest in its own
research infrastructure. In addition to a myriad of day to day policy choices,
Canada also faces major challenges on climate change, energy, pandemic response,
drug safety and national security. To deal effectively with this array of
issues, it is imperative that the Government have its own reliable, disinterested
source of research, knowledge and advice to rely upon. Government departments
and agencies, such as Natural Resources Canada, Environment Canada, Fisheries
and Oceans Canada, Health Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the
National Research Council (NRC) can fill this role.
In addition to being independent, these organizations also engage in extraordinary
work. At a time when the Government is experimenting with new mechanisms
for facilitating research, it must not forget the successes of traditional
models. Canadian Nobel Laureate Gerhard Herzberg’s pioneering achievements
in molecular spectroscopy at the National Research Council is one example
of that organization’s outstanding contribution to science. Similar
success stories can be found within government departments. The groundbreaking
work of Dr. Keith Downey at Agriculture Canada (together with Dr. Burton
Craig at the NRC) led to the development of the modern Canola industry,
an industry that contributes more than $6 billion annually to the Canadian
economy.
Despite the extraordinary service these departments and agencies have rendered
to Canadians, they are all suffering from the lack of necessary financial
support. In preparing this brief, the Consortium turned to Statistics Canada
for basic quantitative data on Canada’s economy, population and education
systems. We found an agency struggling to provide information in an atmosphere
of chronic under-staffing - beset by retirements and without money to replace
departing employees. To correct this particular situation, and the broader
problem, the Government must direct attention to assessing and supporting
the research expenditure needs of its own departments and agencies. The
Consortium was pleased with the creation and mandate of the National Science
Advisor (NSA) several years ago. This office should be sufficiently funded
to properly undertake major projects including a review of the government's
research infrastructure and its needs.
PART THREE - CONCLUSION
Structural factors in the Canadian economy, notably a high level of foreign
ownership and a reliance on resource extraction, mean that a large proportion
of the research conducted in Canada is performed in the public sector. Because
of this, and the direct relationship between a research intensive society
and a modern, productive economy, the Government of Canada must generously
fund Canada’s research capabilities. The Canadian Consortium for Research
recommends that the Government:
- One - Increase Funding for the Core Operating Costs of Post-secondary
Education Institutions through the Creation of a Dedicated Federal/Provincial
Transfer. To be successful the transfer must:
- be governed by nationally established principles ensuring accessibility,
quality and academic integrity;
- contain binding enforcement mechanisms; and
- to avoid perennial federal provincial disputes over the transfer
amount, be set at a fixed percentage of GDP (a target of 0.5% GDP
would restore federal funding to that of the late 1970's).
- Two - Increase the budgets of the federal research granting
agencies. Specifically:
- strengthen social, human and cultural research in Canada by increasing
the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s funding
to $460 million by 2008-2009;
- increase the budget of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research
to $1 billion by 2008-2009; and
- increase the budget of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council to $1.2 billion by 2008-2009.
- Three - Re-invest in Government Research Infrastructure
including government departments and agencies such as the National Research
Council. These institutions have a history of extraordinary achievement.
They are ideally suited to provide the government with its own source
of research, knowledge and advice, unbeholden to special interests or
private agendas.
|
 |

 |
CCR: Submission to the
House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance August 2008
Posted: Sep. 22, 2008
|
 |
PAGSE:
Annual Activity Report 2007-2008
Posted: Sep. 22, 2008
|
 |
PAGSE:
Submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance 2008 Pre-Budget
Consultation
Posted: August 28, 2008
|
 |
Study
on Canadian Science and Technology Brief Submitted to the House of Commons
Posted: April 16, 2008
|
 |
PAGSE:
Submission to the Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology
Posted: April 17, 2008
|
 |
CCAC
Year-End Performance Report 2007-2008
Posted: April 17, 2008
|
 |
PAGSE:
The Past Six Months (July-Dec 2007)
Posted: February 11, 2008
|
 |
Meetings with
Decision Makers 2007
Posted: January 15, 2008
|
 |
CSZ 2007 Advocacy
Meetings
Posted: Sept. 19, 07
|
 |
CCR: A Brief
to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance
Posted: August 31, 07
|
 |
PAGSE:
The Past Six Months (July-Dec 06)/ PFST: Les six derniers mois (janvier-mai
06)
Posted: Feb.5,07
|
 |
CCUBC
Nov. 2006 Advocacy Meetings
Posted: Dec. 7, 06
|
 |
Sustaining a
Renewable Resource
Posted: Sept. 28, 06
|
 |
CCR
Brief to House of Commons' Standing Committee on Finance
Posted: Sept. 20, 05
|
 |
Value
from Investing in a Creative Environment
Posted: Sept. 16, 05
|
 |
Sustaining
& Expanding Innovation
Posted: Sept. 04
|
 |
Access
to Post Secondary & Graduate Education
Posted: Sept 03
|
 |
Capacity
for Innovation
Posted: Aug. 02
|
 |
Creating
a Research Environment
Posted: Fall 2000
|
 |
Mining
for Gold
Posted: Spring 2001 |
 |

|